Why is this function slow?
A code review that names the cause rather than listing generic advice. Cream page and the model name in the header.
Use this templateBuild a Claude screenshot on the cream page that identifies it before a word is read — the clay starburst, user messages as square-cornered cards rather than pills, the model name in the header, and answers running full-width with no bubble behind them.
Each one opens in the editor as an editable, fictional scene — names, timings and interface details already set. Change a word, or change everything.
A code review that names the cause rather than listing generic advice. Cream page and the model name in the header.
Use this templateEditing help that actually cuts rather than rephrasing. The shape writers screenshot.
Use this templateA plain-English reading of dense text — with the caveat that it isn't legal advice, which is the part that matters.
Use this templateThe three above are what this interface is genuinely used for: a code review that names the cause, an edit that actually cuts, and a plain-English reading of a contract clause with the right caveat attached.
The header names the version, so set it to whichever one the scene needs. It is a small field and one of the clearest tells.
Your messages render as bordered cream cards with a small radius. Keep them short — the contrast against a long answer is part of what makes the layout read correctly.
Full-width, with paragraphs and lists. Claude's replies tend to end with a caveat or a thing to watch for, and including one makes the mockup platform-specific rather than generic.
PNG at 1× free, up to 3× on Pro, the whole conversation or one screen, with or without the phone frame.
Our Claude skin is rebuilt from the real interface in code rather than traced from a screenshot, so the details that make it recognisable survive at export resolution. Here is what those details actually are.
Every other assistant in the set is white or near-black. Claude is a warm off-white, and that single colour does most of the identifying work before a word is read. A Claude mockup on a white background reads as ChatGPT with an orange icon, however correct everything else is.
The mark is a radial burst in Anthropic's clay orange — not a four-point star, not a circle, not a chat glyph. It is the second thing your eye finds after the page colour, and the two together are the whole identity.
The user's message is a bordered card with a small corner radius, not a pill. Claude's interface is consistently less rounded than its competitors, and copying ChatGPT's radius is the mistake that makes an otherwise-correct mockup feel wrong without anyone being able to say why.
“Claude Sonnet 4.5” sits in the header, because Anthropic surfaces the version far more prominently than anyone else does. Nobody screenshots ChatGPT with a model number at the top; with Claude it is right there, and leaving it out loses a real tell.
Claude's replies tend to run — paragraphs, a bulleted list, a caveat at the end. The code-review example above ends by flagging what might break downstream, which is the shape people screenshot. A three-word answer is not what this interface usually contains.
Responses are plain full-width text with the mark beside them. Your message is contained; the answer is not. That asymmetry is what makes an assistant screenshot different from a messenger one, and it is shared across all five AI skins here.
Everything made here is simulated. SocialMock has no connection to Claude and cannot read, send or alter a real message. Do not use a mockup to impersonate anyone, pass it off as a genuine screenshot, or present it as evidence in any legal, workplace or academic matter — see our Acceptable Use policy. For general information about legal risk, read is it legal to fake a screenshot? If you publish somewhere a viewer might mistake it for real, switch on the “Simulated” label before exporting.
Click straight into the preview and type. Export when you are done — free at 1×, up to 3× on Pro.
Open the Claude editor