Give me the blunt version
Grok's whole personality in four exchanges, on the pure-black page that identifies it.
Use this templateBuild a Grok screenshot on the pure-black page with no accent colour anywhere — the hard-edged xAI slash, a user bubble that is outlined rather than filled, and answers written the way Grok actually answers, because the tone is part of the interface.
Each one opens in the editor as an editable, fictional scene — names, timings and interface details already set. Change a word, or change everything.
Grok's whole personality in four exchanges, on the pure-black page that identifies it.
Use this templateChecking a claim somebody stated with total certainty at dinner. Written for media-literacy material.
Use this templateProduct naming, and the moment it stops offering options and picks one.
Use this templateThe three above are written the way Grok answers: a blunt read on eleven months of not shipping, a naming session that commits to one option, and a confident dinner-party claim checked properly.
Grok's canonical look is true black. The Dark toggle is in the studio header, and it is the version almost every real screenshot is in.
Your messages render as an outlined bubble with a hairline border — not a filled one. Short prompts suit the interface and the tone.
This is the part people get wrong. Grok's positioning is bluntness, so a hedged four-caveat answer reads as the wrong product no matter how accurate the pixels are.
PNG at 1× free, up to 3× on Pro, the whole conversation or one screen, with or without the phone frame.
Our Grok skin is rebuilt from the real interface in code rather than traced from a screenshot, so the details that make it recognisable survive at export resolution. Here is what those details actually are.
There is no accent colour anywhere in Grok — no blue send button, no coloured mark, no tinted surface. Every other assistant has one hue doing the branding; Grok has none, and reproducing that absence is harder than adding a colour because the temptation is always to put something in.
Grok's light mode is a very light grey rather than the pure white every other assistant uses, and the dark mode is true black rather than a dark neutral. Both directions are pushed further than the rest of the set, which is why a Grok mockup at #FFFFFF looks subtly wrong.
xAI's glyph is a hard-edged pair of strokes. No gradient, no circle, no roundness. Beside a Gemini sparkle or a Claude starburst it is unmistakable, and it is the only mark in the set with no curve in it at all.
A modest 16px radius with a hairline border rather than a solid fill — nothing else in the set does this. ChatGPT and Gemini fill their user bubbles; Claude uses a bordered card but on cream. Grok's outlined-on-black is its own thing.
Grok's whole positioning is that it answers bluntly. A mockup with a carefully hedged, four-caveat answer is not a Grok screenshot however correct the pixels are — the writing has to match, which is why the examples above are written short and direct.
Your message is contained; the reply is not. That asymmetry is shared across all five assistants here and is what separates an AI screenshot from a messenger one — there are not two people, there is a person and a system.
Everything made here is simulated. SocialMock has no connection to Grok and cannot read, send or alter a real message. Do not use a mockup to impersonate anyone, pass it off as a genuine screenshot, or present it as evidence in any legal, workplace or academic matter — see our Acceptable Use policy. For general information about legal risk, read is it legal to fake a screenshot? If you publish somewhere a viewer might mistake it for real, switch on the “Simulated” label before exporting.
Click straight into the preview and type. Export when you are done — free at 1×, up to 3× on Pro.
Open the Grok editor